Why don't we see the inherent value of each person living their full potential? Let me expand.
I have always believed in the value of having diversity of types of intelligence, but it is becoming even more prevalent as I have developed friendships with those in different areas of study/interest, and as I have been substitute teaching in my old school district and reading books such as Savage Inequalities (a MUST read!). I always did well in school, fitting comfortably into the mold that our school system asks of students, but as I get older I realize just how unmalleable that mold is (and how narrow in focus it is becoming). It saddens me to hear intelligence being measured as how good students are at math and science, or how well someone can "articulate" themselves. The other week I subbed for a 12th grade English class. There was a boy in the class that wants to go to UofM for biomedical engineering. Everyone in the class obviously looked to him as the smartest in the room. When giving an opinion on something, everyone took it as fact. I asked why everyone just took it as fact (we were having a lighter type of discussion) and one girl responded saying "Well we trust him because he's so smart". It amazes me how we give power to those that are smart in the "respectable" subjects, to be validated in their opinions on any subject there-after since they have proved their "worth". The perfect example is Bill Gates. Since he has proven his smarts in creating Microsoft and making billions, he now has found a way to have a say in matters he has no expertise in. He is now helping to form our education system through his advocacy for math and science. I know that money has power, but to have a say in such a crucial aspect of our society, when he has no background in education (besides having gone through an education system), does not bode well.
Imagine if we had a famous painter advocating for certain technological advancements in the health care field that they had no former schooling on. They have been through the health care system many times, due to previous illness, but this is the extent of their knowledge. I think that society as a whole would not take them seriously. Even, dare I say, if they were in the top 1%, monetarily speaking. But then again, I do not know if someone in this field would even try to do such a thing. I think that we have given an un-do level of entitlement to those that are intelligent in the math and sciences, to say that they know just as much as those that are experts in other arenas. I do not mean to hate on those that are intelligent in those areas, I value your smarts, but just not at the expense of others.
I argue that all intelligences are equally impressive and as equally important as the next. The ability of a sculptor to create a physical representation of every sorrow ever felt by unrequited love, blows my mind just as much as someone that understands quantum physics. It is said that it was the beginnings of the creation of art that separated humans from the animal world. Art enriches everyones lives. Ranging from the music you listen/dance to, or the painting that you have in your house, all of our lives are enriched and deepened through this form of intelligence. Same goes with writers and lovers of history or culture. If we didn't have poetry or conversations about how the past is recreated in the present, how would our society function? While doctors may help me lead a physically healthy life- artists, philosophers, etc. help me lead an emotionally and spiritually healthy life. This diversity helps us look at the world in new ways, and work off of each other in a manner that truly reveals our level of interconnection. We are a part of a whole, none of us function as disconnected individuals. We need each other, and we need diversity of interest and skill.
One example that speaks to the need of diversity of interest and skill- janitors and groundskeepers at our universities are just as important as the professors. Here is why. At UofM, prospective students take tours daily- many that are considering several other universities. If the university did not look as nice as it does, with clean halls and well-kept lawns, would these students choose UofM? Honestly, probably not. Aesthetics matter (just like how art matters). People judge by looks. If the buildings were dreary, dusty, and dirty and the grounds of the school weren't so beautiful, would students want to spend four years at university here? Not when they have other schools to compare it to. So if it weren't for those that help to keep our university beautiful, then we may not have even chosen to go here and the amazing professors may have chosen to work somewhere else. We should not create a hierarchy of importance when we all matter.
So back to my first proclamation- why don't we help each other live to our own full potentials, rather than try to competitively fit everyone into the same mold? I talk to students in the middle school who are in the resource room, and you can tell they have been beaten down with their poor grades in math and english. But then upon engaging in conversation, you are quick to realize the passion that they may hold for music or sports; where they truly shine. Instead of looking at students in terms of how much they will monetarily profit society in the future and investing in those that are going to give the "highest" return, let us look at what enriches the soul of society. I am not looking for the U.S. to out-compete other countries in math and science, I am looking for a country that produces the happiest and most loving people per capita. I could care less about these advancements if, at the same time, we are living amongst those that are depressed, anxious, or disconnected due to not fitting into the "mold" our society has formed. Personally, if I live a high-quality life, it is more important to me than low-quality and living for 100+ years. I feed off others happiness and love, and I am pretty sure others do to. So in the end, we all benefit from helping others reach our full potential, and we must help support each other where we shine.
I have always believed in the value of having diversity of types of intelligence, but it is becoming even more prevalent as I have developed friendships with those in different areas of study/interest, and as I have been substitute teaching in my old school district and reading books such as Savage Inequalities (a MUST read!). I always did well in school, fitting comfortably into the mold that our school system asks of students, but as I get older I realize just how unmalleable that mold is (and how narrow in focus it is becoming). It saddens me to hear intelligence being measured as how good students are at math and science, or how well someone can "articulate" themselves. The other week I subbed for a 12th grade English class. There was a boy in the class that wants to go to UofM for biomedical engineering. Everyone in the class obviously looked to him as the smartest in the room. When giving an opinion on something, everyone took it as fact. I asked why everyone just took it as fact (we were having a lighter type of discussion) and one girl responded saying "Well we trust him because he's so smart". It amazes me how we give power to those that are smart in the "respectable" subjects, to be validated in their opinions on any subject there-after since they have proved their "worth". The perfect example is Bill Gates. Since he has proven his smarts in creating Microsoft and making billions, he now has found a way to have a say in matters he has no expertise in. He is now helping to form our education system through his advocacy for math and science. I know that money has power, but to have a say in such a crucial aspect of our society, when he has no background in education (besides having gone through an education system), does not bode well.
Imagine if we had a famous painter advocating for certain technological advancements in the health care field that they had no former schooling on. They have been through the health care system many times, due to previous illness, but this is the extent of their knowledge. I think that society as a whole would not take them seriously. Even, dare I say, if they were in the top 1%, monetarily speaking. But then again, I do not know if someone in this field would even try to do such a thing. I think that we have given an un-do level of entitlement to those that are intelligent in the math and sciences, to say that they know just as much as those that are experts in other arenas. I do not mean to hate on those that are intelligent in those areas, I value your smarts, but just not at the expense of others.
I argue that all intelligences are equally impressive and as equally important as the next. The ability of a sculptor to create a physical representation of every sorrow ever felt by unrequited love, blows my mind just as much as someone that understands quantum physics. It is said that it was the beginnings of the creation of art that separated humans from the animal world. Art enriches everyones lives. Ranging from the music you listen/dance to, or the painting that you have in your house, all of our lives are enriched and deepened through this form of intelligence. Same goes with writers and lovers of history or culture. If we didn't have poetry or conversations about how the past is recreated in the present, how would our society function? While doctors may help me lead a physically healthy life- artists, philosophers, etc. help me lead an emotionally and spiritually healthy life. This diversity helps us look at the world in new ways, and work off of each other in a manner that truly reveals our level of interconnection. We are a part of a whole, none of us function as disconnected individuals. We need each other, and we need diversity of interest and skill.
One example that speaks to the need of diversity of interest and skill- janitors and groundskeepers at our universities are just as important as the professors. Here is why. At UofM, prospective students take tours daily- many that are considering several other universities. If the university did not look as nice as it does, with clean halls and well-kept lawns, would these students choose UofM? Honestly, probably not. Aesthetics matter (just like how art matters). People judge by looks. If the buildings were dreary, dusty, and dirty and the grounds of the school weren't so beautiful, would students want to spend four years at university here? Not when they have other schools to compare it to. So if it weren't for those that help to keep our university beautiful, then we may not have even chosen to go here and the amazing professors may have chosen to work somewhere else. We should not create a hierarchy of importance when we all matter.
So back to my first proclamation- why don't we help each other live to our own full potentials, rather than try to competitively fit everyone into the same mold? I talk to students in the middle school who are in the resource room, and you can tell they have been beaten down with their poor grades in math and english. But then upon engaging in conversation, you are quick to realize the passion that they may hold for music or sports; where they truly shine. Instead of looking at students in terms of how much they will monetarily profit society in the future and investing in those that are going to give the "highest" return, let us look at what enriches the soul of society. I am not looking for the U.S. to out-compete other countries in math and science, I am looking for a country that produces the happiest and most loving people per capita. I could care less about these advancements if, at the same time, we are living amongst those that are depressed, anxious, or disconnected due to not fitting into the "mold" our society has formed. Personally, if I live a high-quality life, it is more important to me than low-quality and living for 100+ years. I feed off others happiness and love, and I am pretty sure others do to. So in the end, we all benefit from helping others reach our full potential, and we must help support each other where we shine.

